yep: here the extra part:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-extras/ (not specific
IIRC)

and here the email:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/EmailValidator.java

Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2012/12/17 John D. Ament <[email protected]>:
> +1 to Romain's thoughts.
>
> DeltaSpike shouldn't care about Validations, since
> javax.validator.Validator is already injectable to the application stack.
>  Hibernate Validator already provides an @Email as well, perhaps it would
> be worthwhile to encourage that community publish the constraints in an
> implementation inspecific fashion (right now I think they're just part of
> the JAR).
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> about bval we should maybe see with bval project. IMO we shouldnt take
>> validator which doesn't need CDI (bval-extra is here for that) - i
>> think to email one which is already in place in bval-extra
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>:
>> > ng i used in some project is
>>

Reply via email to