yep, that's the idea, now we just need motivated people ;) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2012/12/17 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > Almost like a cross community interaction, similar to the way DS started? > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> +1 for a separated lib but not in DS IMO >> >> could be a commons-bval or something like that no? depend the amount >> of validations >> >> that's said bval-extra works too and i think i saw the same in >> hibernate (can't remember the name) >> >> maybe just another "merge" project to create, wdyt? >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> 2012/12/17 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: >> > +0 (what we would really need with both bval and hibernate-validator is a >> > constraint-lib which is packaged separately from the bv-impl.) >> > >> > @ thomas: >> > besides discussions on the list, you could follow [1]. >> > >> > regards, >> > gerhard >> > >> > [1] >> > >> http://incubator.apache.org/deltaspike/suggested-git-workflows.html#discussion-workflow-optional >> > >> > >> > >> > 2012/12/17 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> > >> >> yep: here the extra part: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-extras/ (not specific >> >> IIRC) >> >> >> >> and here the email: >> >> >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/EmailValidator.java >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2012/12/17 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: >> >> > +1 to Romain's thoughts. >> >> > >> >> > DeltaSpike shouldn't care about Validations, since >> >> > javax.validator.Validator is already injectable to the application >> stack. >> >> > Hibernate Validator already provides an @Email as well, perhaps it >> would >> >> > be worthwhile to encourage that community publish the constraints in >> an >> >> > implementation inspecific fashion (right now I think they're just >> part of >> >> > the JAR). >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> about bval we should maybe see with bval project. IMO we shouldnt >> take >> >> >> validator which doesn't need CDI (bval-extra is here for that) - i >> >> >> think to email one which is already in place in bval-extra >> >> >> >> >> >> wdyt? >> >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> >> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> >> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> >> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2012/12/17 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>: >> >> >> > ng i used in some project is >> >> >> >> >> >>
