hi john,

@ examples:
we haven't discussed what our goal is here

@ DS-60
imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 >short< after 0.4)

@ DS-113
we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to an own module
(i'll create the module today)

@ DS-263
not needed, but nice to have -> +1
(you can have a look at the setup we used in codi for it to know what you
need)

@ DS-278
i re-opened it because we should find a better approach imo.
however, it isn't a real blocker

regards,
gerhard



2013/3/25 John D. Ament <[email protected]>

> All,
>
> Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted to help get things started to move
> towards a 0.4 release.  I created the filter at [1] to show our current
> progress.
>
> We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4, with 27 unresolved for the
> release.  Some of these issues stick out, with me thinking that we've
> actually completed them but perhaps need some finalization (note: I'll use
> the abbreviation DS for the DELTASPIKE key in JIRA which is TL;DR)
>
> DS-306 - I see examples.  Do we need more?
> DS-60 - I believe we have started integrating CDI Query.  Should this have
> spawned child tasks?
> DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns on this one and apparently it works just
> like the Seam3 version.  Can this be closed?
>
>
> Some low hanging fruit:
>
> DS-263 - I was actually looking for something like this as well.  I've been
> playing with JBoss modules a lot and think having a binary release would
> help add DS as a JBoss Module.  If this isn't complete, do we need it in
> 0.4?
>
> DS-278 - If not done, seems easy enough to add.
>
> DS-288 - Seems like another needed feature, but wasn't too difficult in
> either CODI or Seam3.
>
> DS-289 - Ironically, this one isn't even scheduled for 0.4 but is a blocker
> for the release.  I'll update it as such.
>
> If you have something in the list below that shouldn't be (e.g. it's not
> needed for 0.4) we should get it rescheduled.  Since previously only 289
> was declared needed for 0.4 we should be looking at everything else.
>
> John
>
> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788
>

Reply via email to