Hi DS-60: we are a bunch o wait after it
DS-113: think we can push partial bean to another release and keep interface handling for this iteration (well if you import asm part right now it can work but then the question will be which shade version? a proxy as in cxf?....) other are not blocker IMO *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/3/25 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > hi john, > > @ examples: > we haven't discussed what our goal is here > > @ DS-60 > imo we should do it for 0.5 (and release 0.5 >short< after 0.4) > > @ DS-113 > we have to change the proxy-lib and move it to an own module > (i'll create the module today) > > @ DS-263 > not needed, but nice to have -> +1 > (you can have a look at the setup we used in codi for it to know what you > need) > > @ DS-278 > i re-opened it because we should find a better approach imo. > however, it isn't a real blocker > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/3/25 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > > All, > > > > Based on the flurry of threads, I wanted to help get things started to > move > > towards a 0.4 release. I created the filter at [1] to show our current > > progress. > > > > We currently have 50 issues fixed in 0.4, with 27 unresolved for the > > release. Some of these issues stick out, with me thinking that we've > > actually completed them but perhaps need some finalization (note: I'll > use > > the abbreviation DS for the DELTASPIKE key in JIRA which is TL;DR) > > > > DS-306 - I see examples. Do we need more? > > DS-60 - I believe we have started integrating CDI Query. Should this > have > > spawned child tasks? > > DS-113 - Gerhard took the reigns on this one and apparently it works just > > like the Seam3 version. Can this be closed? > > > > > > Some low hanging fruit: > > > > DS-263 - I was actually looking for something like this as well. I've > been > > playing with JBoss modules a lot and think having a binary release would > > help add DS as a JBoss Module. If this isn't complete, do we need it in > > 0.4? > > > > DS-278 - If not done, seems easy enough to add. > > > > DS-288 - Seems like another needed feature, but wasn't too difficult in > > either CODI or Seam3. > > > > DS-289 - Ironically, this one isn't even scheduled for 0.4 but is a > blocker > > for the release. I'll update it as such. > > > > If you have something in the list below that shouldn't be (e.g. it's not > > needed for 0.4) we should get it rescheduled. Since previously only 289 > > was declared needed for 0.4 we should be looking at everything else. > > > > John > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323788 > > >
