yes - for ee7 (the vote for jsf 2.2 is fine). regards, gerhard
2013/5/1 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > That means the rep for Red Hat didn't vote in the specified time of the > vote. > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > hi hantsy, > > > > see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as > well). > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2013/5/1 hantsy <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE > 7. > > > > > > And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners > > > still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big > > > disappointment. And other two "big" features introduced in JSF2.2, > > > resource contract and flow, I also have no interest. > > > > > > Especially the flow, the definition is very tedious, I hope Apache > > > Deltaspike can pick up the simple @ConversationScoped and @Begin @End > > > annotations in Seam 2 to implement a simple page flow solution . > > > > > > BTW, in the vote page, I found the status of Redhat is "not voted", > > > what this means? > > > > > > Hantsy > > > -- > > > Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China > > > > > > > > > -- > Jason Porter > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp >
