yes, I means the vote of ee7. I just get the post on jboss.org, http://planet.jboss.org/post/ee7_is_approved.
Mark Little explained the vote result. When I saw the result, I had thought weather there were some conflict between RedHat and Oracle, now it seems my mistake. Hantsy On 5/1/2013 23:15, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > yes - for ee7 (the vote for jsf 2.2 is fine). > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/5/1 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > >> That means the rep for Red Hat didn't vote in the specified time of the >> vote. >> >> >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek < >> [email protected] >>> wrote: >>> hi hantsy, >>> >>> see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as >> well). >>> regards, >>> gerhard >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/5/1 hantsy <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE >> 7. >>>> And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners >>>> still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big >>>> disappointment. And other two "big" features introduced in JSF2.2, >>>> resource contract and flow, I also have no interest. >>>> >>>> Especially the flow, the definition is very tedious, I hope Apache >>>> Deltaspike can pick up the simple @ConversationScoped and @Begin @End >>>> annotations in Seam 2 to implement a simple page flow solution . >>>> >>>> BTW, in the vote page, I found the status of Redhat is "not voted", >>>> what this means? >>>> >>>> Hantsy >>>> -- >>>> Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Jason Porter >> http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp >> -- Fulltime Java EE Freelancer from China
