On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 16:54 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote: > Am 03.04.2015 um 15:33 schrieb Richard Shann: > > On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 15:01 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote: > [...]code starts #ifdef DEVELOPER. > > > > I'll be happy to help! > > I see. I will look into that next weekend. (Then I'll have a six hours > train ride which is perfect for such a work.) Thank you for your offer > to help, I probably will come back to it. > > Before I read your mail I had found out that MuseScore can import > Capella files and export MusicXML. So I tried that way. In MuseScore the > score looks good, but after import of the MusicXML in Denemo I still > need lots of editing. > > If I can get the Capella import to work, hopefully the situation with > importing files into Denemo gets better.
Another possibility would be to improve Denemo's musicXML import - the sort of trouble I see is things like time signature changes and double barlines getting repeated, and problems with upbeats (anacrusis...). I stopped working on it once it was importing the bulk data as the sort of score I import doesn't have much if any time signature changes (etc) and there is only one upbeat per movement (etc). Can you send me a problematic example of musicXML output from MuseScore? If it is bad output from MuseScore then directly importing Capella files might be a way to go as I guess Capella is storing information in an easier to read form than musicXML. It is easier to write bad musicXML than to try to read any sort of musicXML - did you try reading back the musicXML into MuseScore? Richard > In the past, I used MIDI import > and always needed hours of work after the import to get a score > correctly into Denemo. > > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Denemo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
