Am 04.04.2015 um 17:13 schrieb Richard Shann: > Another possibility would be to improve Denemo's musicXML import - the > sort of trouble I see is things like time signature changes and double > barlines getting repeated, and problems with upbeats (anacrusis...). I > stopped working on it once it was importing the bulk data as the sort of > score I import doesn't have much if any time signature changes (etc) and > there is only one upbeat per movement (etc). > Can you send me a problematic example of musicXML output from MuseScore? > If it is bad output from MuseScore then directly importing Capella files > might be a way to go as I guess Capella is storing information in an > easier to read form than musicXML. It is easier to write bad musicXML > than to try to read any sort of musicXML - did you try reading back the > musicXML into MuseScore?
As you suggested, I re-imported the MusicXML into MuseScore, and it looks like it's not much different from what Denemo gives -- apart from several additional empty staffs that Denemo produces (in fact three for each real staff). I'll send you the score per PM. Andreas _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
