The N50 value is about contigs>=500.

Another question,
I have made a similar question again
but I want to be sure
I assembled the rhodobacter 2.4.1
with AllpathsLg
and Ray -k 31 -p (the following libraries)
using the following libraries:

as fragment lib:
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/SRX000946

and jumping libs :
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/SRX016062
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/SRX016063

but I get totally diferrent results for example
for Ray:
N50 for Contigs >= 100 nt   4.579
N50 for  Contigs >= 500 nt  5.611
N50 for Scaffolds >= 100 nt 4.931
N50 for Scaffolds >= 100 nt 5.993

and AllPathsLg
N50 contigs 240.400
N50 scaffolds 2.956.000

1) isn't it strange that the
N50 for Contigs >= 100 nt is bigger than
N50 for  Contigs >= 500 nt ?
(The same for scaffolds)


2) because i use jumping libraries
  should I use them differently in Ray
or process them with a tool?


3)Generally using jumping libraries
should I handle them differently, or reverse them?

Thank you.

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:28 PM, nikos ioannidis <niioa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> i want to ask if i run twice the Ray is it normal to take slightly different 
> results?
> Also when i use more cpus the time shouldn't reduce? or depents?
> And another one, when i use more cpus this affects my results?
> for example using 224 cpus for e.coli i get N50=80011
> and if i use 64 cpus i get N50=68137, is normal to have a value +- 10K??
>
>
> Thank you.
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Denovoassembler-users mailing list
Denovoassembler-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/denovoassembler-users

Reply via email to