Niclas Hedhman wrote: ...
I still believe that Gump descriptors should be an 'output artifact' and not an 'input artifact' in Repository Heaven.
Creation of a solid model that fits the needs we can find, then it shouldn't be that hard to generate Gump descriptors as a side-effect.
I think we are talking different languages ;-)
I'm not saying that the Gump descriptor is a blessing. I just see that there is *a lot* of metadata information *already* there, and it's *updated*.
Now, we can make our own version, or build on something that is already there. I think that it's possible and better, _but_ it's too early to tell, as we haven't decided what we need yet ;-)
So, let's forget for a moment this thing and start building our layers.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
