Re: UpdaterConfig

[Markus M. May]

+1 for removal of everything unused and not needed right now. after we 
have cleared the API we could add this once again. there is still svn 
which takes care about backups :-)
Nick Chalko wrote:
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
like I said already, I am browsing through the API and adding JavaDoc to
 some classes. Right now I have a problem concerning the UpdaterConfig.
This class is called all over the API and should provide basic
configuration for the application. But right now, I am pretty unsure,
how this configuration is provided to the calling classes.
  

That was (is?) a nice experiment by Anou. Basically we wanted some 
form of
'ant types' (configuration in XML) but outside of Ant. The configuration
file is read, and named configured objects are stored in a registry (by
namespaced name).

I think it works, but has some usage issues, so right now I'm kinda 
hoping
to leave it on the side, until we find time to work on it. I do like the
idea.
 

My preference is to CUT what is not being used. If there is not a test 
case that exercise this,  ask about it on the list and then we can kill it.

R,
Nick