-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
+1
~ -jean
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
| Derby is being sponsored by the Apache DB project and the Derby | status page states 'The Apache DB project will own the Derby | subproject, and the subproject will follow the Apache DB PMC's | direction'. I assume the 'will own' means if Derby graduates from | incubation. (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/derby.html) | | I propose a consensus approval vote that the Derby development | model follows the guidelines defined by the Apache DB project. This | will set the initial rules for development, changes to the model | could subsequently be called for and voted on using the Derby | developer mailing list. | | The guidelines are defined at http://db.apache.org/guidelines.html | | There is one difference that the Derby code is in SVN and not CVS. | | Note the decision making page at | http://db.apache.org/decisions.html and the Changes section on this | page http://db.apache.org/source.html. | | The Changes section indicates the commit model is: | | (quote) | | Simple patches to fix bugs can be committed then reviewed. With a | commit-then-review process, the Committer is trusted to have a high | degree of confidence in the change. | | Doubtful changes, new features, and large scale overhauls need to | be discussed before committing them into the repository. Any change | that affects the semantics of an existing API function, the size of | the program, configuration data formats, or other major areas must | receive consensus approval before being committed. | | (end-quote) | | Dan. | | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBNf4HF0L6u5lYbCYRArUCAJ9lsfy38rPPjOI3sbDOlerCCf5i/wCfVpaa 0r25YGk36jOluruhmVvRz7Q= =dLxK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
