-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > I don't understand - has IBM required that we keep IBM copyright on the > source? >
Geir, I am not privy to any discussion between IBM and ASF. However, we are including the IBM copyright statement line, to achieve consensus while abiding by ASF copyright guidelines. Jonas S Karlsson wrote: > Thus I vote for Option 1: > (i.e. that we should use the apache format of the copyright notice) > > +1 > > (however I'd like to keep the apache on top, since it will have later > years and will be updated "frequently", and it is the most relevant > one) > Jonas, I am counting your earlier vote for Option 1. You do not need to re-vote. It make sense to keep the ASF notice on top, so I moved it up. Jalud, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBR50R2MOhC3LM/1oRAoSXAJ9aWaewIBSvtcN3E6J4LE/NBpCU4QCg6gND IAPtWY7cbHeCyklfr/waTkk= =YlMt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
