Mamta Satoor wrote: >"Jean T. Anderson" wrote: > > >>Daniel John Debrunner wrote: >> >> >>>Andrew McIntyre wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I have updated the version number on the branch to 10.0.2.2 to >>>>distinguish newer branch builds from the current release. The branch was >>>>created as of svn revision 110050. >>>> >>>> >>>So since the release was at svn revision 106978 and the branch at >>>110050, I think it means the commits listed below are in the 10.0 >>>branch, but not in the release. Thus they would automatically be >>>included in any future 10.0 release or snapshot. They all seem to be >>>within the scope of a bug-fix/stable branch so I say "lazy approval" for >>>including them in the 10.0 branch. >>>... >>> >>> >>This may be a dumb question, but why wouldn't the branch have been made >>at 106979 ? Why have a gap between the release and the branch? >> >> >My guess is that between the time when release was made and branch was >cut, there were checkins into other Apache projects and that is why the >jump in the number.but I could be wrong. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SummarizeList?listId=272 shows there are lots of derby svn revisions between 106978 and 110050.
-jean
