--- scott hutinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > I think another important item would be something > along the lines of the > document build date; ie: > "Derby Document build: some ISO date type timestamp > here". > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt > > Derby Document build: 2005-03-21T16:00Z : 21 March > 2005 or March 21 2005 > > I don't agree with much of anything dealing with > time/dates/timezones, > but adding the month and day in text at least > removes some of the > confusion, possibly more if doing multiple > languages... Some type of > timestamp would allow people to re-cycle > documentation that tends to get > stale, with a date being self documenting. I would > guess the title page > might be a good location(?). > > OR > whatever timestamp works :-) Until things get more > stable. > > Possibly some other method would work better. > > scott >
Good idea Scott...I'll try to add a timestamp to my modified xsl file so it autmatically generates that...Thanks for the tip!
