Re: Planning for a 10.1 release

[Lance J. Andersen]

I have had a report internally where we have 2 unit tests fail with the DerbyNetwork client driver that did not fail with the DB2 type 4 driver with Derby. We have not had a chance to look into this yet in detail yet.   If we can package up the failure, are there any volunteers on the IBM side who have access to the DB2  jdbc driver code to see why there might be a difference in behavior? For packaging, let us include the frameworks directory which has the scripts for the networkserver (btw did you get a chance to commit the patch i had sent to add the derbyclient support?) Regards, lance Mamta Satoor wrote: Hi Andrew,   I am working on getting JDBC updatable resultset functionality working for Network Server using Derby Net Client. Will send a patch in couple days if not earlier.   Mamta   On 5/17/05, Andrew McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello derby-dev, Now that there have been some significant new contributions to Derby since 10.0.2.1 was released, I think we should begin planning for a 10.1 release. As promised earlier, I'll volunteer to be release manager. So, here goes: 1) Are there any new features or significant bugfixes near completion that should be in the 10.1 release? Dan mentioned that he would like to have his JSR-169 work included, Tomohito's fix for Derby-167 looks nearly complete, and David V.C. has a couple of items that look like they might be done soon. Any estimates on when these will be completed? Anything else not mentioned here? 2) Are there any currently opened JIRA entries that should be considered showstoppers for this release? Any upgrade issues definitely need to be sorted out and tested, maybe we should have a JIRA for this. Documentation of new features should be finalized. I think there may already be a JIRA entry for this. 3) Which bugs would be nice-to-have in this release but are not showstoppers? I personally would like to see the patch for Derby-1 committed. 4) Are there any issues surrounding the client that should be addressed before it is released? This deserves its own thread, and there's already one started here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200505.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] That thread got quiet, but I'll respond to that mail to keep the discussion going. 5) Are there any changes to the packaging that people would like to see for this release? Feel free to add to this list and I'll keep track of all the responses. andrew