On 6/10/05, Bernt M. Johnsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Myrna van Lunteren wrote (2005-06-09 14:17:51):
> On 6/8/05, Bernt M. Johnsen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Bernt M. Johnsen wrote (2005-05-27 14:31:39):
> > > Could anybody review this?
> >
> > Well?
> >
> > > This patch will make relative() allowed when the cursor is before
> > > first or after last. It will also let absolute(0) be equivalent to
> > > beforeFirst().
> > [..snip..]
>
> Well, well!
> I applied the patch without trouble (I feared it would be out of date
> already :-) ), built without trouble. It all looks reasonable to me.
> However, your patch doesn't include a modified master for scrollCursors2?
> Did you run derbyall?
The patch does include changes to scrollCursors2 and I have run derbyall
> Could this change create trouble for any existing applications? i.e. What
> if someone has programmed an app to do relative(1) in a loop, breaking out
> when the exception is hit?
That's a problem since JDBC 2.0 and 3.0 is not compatible for this
example. I think, anyway, that it's better to be 3.0 compliant than
2.0 compliant.
--
Bernt Marius Johnsen, Database Technology Group,
Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway
Well, I must have made a mistake of some sort - I rebuild & rerun & that test (scrollCursors2) *is* fine.
Apologies...
Myrna
