Hi David,

Thanks for vetting my responses. One nub remains:

I will be happy to change my symbol casing if you feel passionately about this. I think, however, that our existing ant scripts are fairly poor examples of ant usage. For instance, they do not take advantage of the -projecthelp machinery and they jump through crazy hoops because they don't understand custom ant tasks. I think symbol casing is just one example of ant style and usage which needs improvement across our scripts. I, however, am not willing to go to the stake for this heresy and I will defer to your judgment. Please let me know what you think. :)

Cheers,
-Rick

David W. Van Couvering wrote:



2) Concerning the casing of my symbols: I have tried to follow the same casing policy which I use in Java code. I uppercase constants and I camelcase variables, arguments, and methods.


I am not sure if the same casing policy applies in Ant, at least I haven't seen that in the build.xml files we have.


Reply via email to