Øystein Grøvlen wrote:
"SF" == Stephen Fitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Will it be possible for different
>> connections to use different StorageFactory within the same system?
SF> My understanding is there's one StorageFactory per database, and all
SF> connections to that database use that StorageFactory.
What happens if one when connecting specifies another StorageFactory
than the one currently in use?
Looks like Derby detects there is already a StorageFactory in use for
that directory and database name. It uses the existing one rather than
the specified one even if the specified one is different.
Stephen
SF> I'd like to be able to import existing disk-based databases. So,
SF> rather than specifying it when we create the database, we specify it
SF> when booting the database.
Good idea.
