[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13579277#comment-13579277
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-6061:
----------------------------------
Actually, your patch is in a different format from mine, and the patch command
doesn't seem to know what to do with it. What command do you use to apply
patches that have diff commands inside them?
> Upgrade language is inconsistent
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0
> Reporter: Kim Haase
> Assignee: Kim Haase
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: cdevcsecureroles.html, DERBY-6061-2.diff,
> DERBY-6061-2.zip, DERBY-6061-3.diff, derby-6061-chinese.diff,
> DERBY-6061-code2.diff, DERBY-6061-code2.stat, DERBY-6061-code.diff,
> DERBY-6061.diff, DERBY-6061.stat, DERBY-6061.zip
>
>
> In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "soft".
> I think we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was changed to
> "full" to provide a more accurate description of what happens. There are
> still a few leftover occurrences of "hard" in the docs here and there.
> However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that kind
> of upgrade. Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good
> alternative?
> I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all
> think makes sense.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
