[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13571336#comment-13571336
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-6061:
----------------------------------
Thanks for all the great advice. I will revise the Dev Guide topic and add to
the code patch. While I am at it, I notice there is one other reference to hard
upgrade in messages that I can find.
java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_it.properties:08004.C.6=L''utente
''{0}'' non pu\u00F2 eseguire l''aggiornamento hard del database ''{1}''. Solo
il proprietario del database pu\u00F2 eseguire questa operazione.
Interestingly, the other European-language properties files that contain this
message don't seem to have the problem:
java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_de_DE.properties:08004.C.6=Benutzer
''{0}'' kann kein Upgrade der Datenbank ''{1}'' erzwingen. Hierzu ist nur der
Datenbankeigent\u00FCmer berechtigt.
java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_es.properties:08004.C.6=El usuario
''{0}'' no puede realizar una actualizaci\u00F3n completa de la base de datos
''{1}''. S\u00F3lo el propietario de la base de datos puede realizar esta
operaci\u00F3n.
java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_fr.properties:08004.C.6=L''utilisateur
''{0}'' ne peut pas effectuer une mise \u00E0 niveau mat\u00E9rielle de la
base de donn\u00E9es ''{1}''. Seul le propri\u00E9taire de la base de
donn\u00E9es peut effectuer cette op\u00E9ration.
German and French just use plain "upgrade"; Spanish uses "full upgrade" (how
clever). I'm helpless with the Asian ones, though.
New patches will be coming.
> Upgrade language is inconsistent
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6061
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6061
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0
> Reporter: Kim Haase
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: cdevcsecureroles.html, DERBY-6061-code.diff,
> DERBY-6061.diff
>
>
> In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "soft".
> I think we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was changed to
> "full" to provide a more accurate description of what happens. There are
> still a few leftover occurrences of "hard" in the docs here and there.
> However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that kind
> of upgrade. Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good
> alternative?
> I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all
> think makes sense.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
