[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13582406#comment-13582406
]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-6066:
----------------------------------------
I am wondering what the community thinks of
1)going ahead and commiting the changes for switching from statement to
prepared statement for getTraqnsactionIsolation
2)and creating a separate issue to find out why the code is not getting used
anymore after the commit for DERBY-4314 went in.
> Client should use a prepared statement rather than regular statement for
> Connection.getTransactionIsolation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6066
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6066
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Network Client
> Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor
> Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor
> Attachments: DERBY6066_patch1_diff.txt, DERBY6066_patch2_diff.txt
>
>
> This jira is similar to DERBY-6053 but for
> o.a.d.client.am.Connection.getTransactionIsolation. Use prepared statement
> rather than regular statement every time user makes a get transaction
> isolation call.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
