[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ahsan shamsudeen updated DERBY-6291:
------------------------------------

    Attachment: UPDATED-DERBY-6291.patch

I have changed some prepareCall() procedures in this patch. This patch too 
contains some errors. Please look at this  and suggest me required changes 
according to my previous comments  which includes the existing problems to be 
solved


                
> Improve code coverage of  org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredCallableStatement
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6291
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6291
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: JDBC
>            Reporter: ahsan shamsudeen
>            Assignee: ahsan shamsudeen
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: derby_triage10_11
>         Attachments: DERBY-6291.patch, setIntPatch.txt, 
> UPDATED-DERBY-6291.patch
>
>
> According to code coverage analysis, 
> org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredCallableStatement is 
> exercised poorly by of our regression tests. The current coverage report for 
> this class can be found at 
> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/coverage/_files/a9.html
> This task is to investigate this class, and either remove the unused code, or 
> add
> regression test that exercise the code, as appropriate.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to