[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13781808#comment-13781808
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-6121:
----------------------------------
Thanks, Knut.
I was wondering what to do about the tableFunctionInvocation topic -- a table
function is a special type of function, but the function name syntax is the
same, of course. I can commit this patch and file another to fix this item (and
anything else anyone notices).
I am wondering whether to commit this patch to both the trunk and the 10.10
branch or just to the trunk. The change is kind of disruptive and almost the
equivalent of a new feature, for docs. On the other hand, committing it to the
branch will not result in any invalid information or break anything. Any
thoughts?
> Regularize how we refer to object names in the Reference Manual
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
> Reporter: Rick Hillegas
> Assignee: Kim Haase
> Attachments: DERBY-6121.diff, DERBY-6121.stat, DERBY-6121.zip,
> rrefsqlj32268.html
>
>
> This issue came up during the buddy testing of user-defined aggregates.
> Here's what Dag discovered:
> identifiers (seen when looking at GRANT USAGE of aggregates):
> "table-Name" occurences are linked to a section explainig them
> (rreftablename.html), but UDA names are defined in-lined as
> GRANT USAGE ON DERBY AGGREGATE [ schemaName. ] SQL92Identifier TO
> grantees
> In a third variant,
> GRANT EXECUTE ON { FUNCTION | PROCEDURE } routine-designator TO grantees
> routine-designator is defined locally as
> routine-designator { function-name | procedure-name }
> without links to what "function-name" or "procedure-name" might look
> like. It would be good to harmonize the latter two forms to a central
> definition as for "table-Name".
> Finally, I noted that the definition page for SchemaName doesn't link to
> the SQL92Identifier page...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
