[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13781845#comment-13781845
]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-6121:
--------------------------------------
I wonder if we'll see another kind of disruption if we don't commit this patch
to the 10.10 branch. That is, disruption caused by the divergence in so many
grammar descriptions. I would vote for backporting this to 10.10. Thanks.
> Regularize how we refer to object names in the Reference Manual
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
> Reporter: Rick Hillegas
> Assignee: Kim Haase
> Attachments: DERBY-6121.diff, DERBY-6121.stat, DERBY-6121.zip,
> rrefsqlj32268.html
>
>
> This issue came up during the buddy testing of user-defined aggregates.
> Here's what Dag discovered:
> identifiers (seen when looking at GRANT USAGE of aggregates):
> "table-Name" occurences are linked to a section explainig them
> (rreftablename.html), but UDA names are defined in-lined as
> GRANT USAGE ON DERBY AGGREGATE [ schemaName. ] SQL92Identifier TO
> grantees
> In a third variant,
> GRANT EXECUTE ON { FUNCTION | PROCEDURE } routine-designator TO grantees
> routine-designator is defined locally as
> routine-designator { function-name | procedure-name }
> without links to what "function-name" or "procedure-name" might look
> like. It would be good to harmonize the latter two forms to a central
> definition as for "table-Name".
> Finally, I noted that the definition page for SchemaName doesn't link to
> the SQL92Identifier page...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
