On Nov 16, 2005, at 11:50 AM, scott hutinger wrote:
I think Jeff has a different setup for the build, as the build.xml
looks like it want's the DITA stuff in the root directory, or
something like that.
My question is, what is the status of the build.xml ? I have an
idea, but just a guess.
Jeff's build.xml is meant to replace the one in the DITA toolkit, not
the build.xml in the Derby docs tree. It is not necessary to use
these two files because our build.xml already makes the necessary
modifications to allow for filenames that end in .dita.
andrew
