On Nov 16, 2005, at 11:00 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On Nov 16, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
Hmm, but we include the entire javacc and jakarta-oro
distributions in the code tree, in tools/java. Should we not
be doing that?
oh. :-) It'd be good to follow-up on that. If another Apache
project does the same, then I wouldn't worry about it --
precedent is good. Also this topic may have been raised before
on infrastructure@ .
Well, here's precedent, FWIW:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xalan/java/trunk/tools/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lenya/trunk/lib/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/forrest/trunk/lib/core/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/ddlutils/trunk/lib/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/beehive/trunk/external/
I could go on, but I won't. :-) Note that the last one has
junit.jar, which I thought was a no-no?
I think you have found adequate precedent. :-)
So, to bring it back around again - do you think it would be ok to
check in the binary distribution of the DITA toolkit into the lib
directory in the Derby docs tree?
andrew
