[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-3155:
---------------------------------
Attachment: derby-3155-09-aa-correlationNames.diff
Attaching derby-3155-09-aa-correlationNames.diff. This patch adds better
support for correlation names in MERGE statements. I am running tests now.
Correlation names on target tables were confusing the bind phase. The fix is to
replace the correlation names with the actual base table name in all
ColumnReferences in all expressions in the MERGE statement. This replacement is
done before any of those expressions are bound.
Touches the following files:
---------------
M java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/MergeNode.java
M java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/MatchingClauseNode.java
The fix.
---------------
M
java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/MergeStatementTest.java
Corresponding test cases.
> Support for SQL:2003 MERGE statement
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3155
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3155
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Reporter: Trejkaz
> Assignee: Rick Hillegas
> Labels: derby_triage10_10
> Attachments: MergeStatement.html, MergeStatement.html,
> MergeStatement.html, derby-3155-01-ac-grammar.diff,
> derby-3155-02-ag-fixParserWarning.diff,
> derby-3155-03-ae-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff,
> derby-3155-03-af-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff,
> derby-3155-03-ag-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff,
> derby-3155-03-ah-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff,
> derby-3155-04-ae-deleteAction.diff, derby-3155-04-af-deleteAction.diff,
> derby-3155-05-aa-triggerTransitionTableAsTarget.diff,
> derby-3155-06-aa-triggerTransitionTableAsSource.diff,
> derby-3155-07-ad-insertAction.diff, derby-3155-08-ah-updateAction.diff,
> derby-3155-09-aa-correlationNames.diff
>
>
> A relatively common piece of logic in a database application is to check for
> a row's existence and then either update or insert depending on its existence.
> SQL:2003 added a MERGE statement to perform this operation. It looks like
> this:
> MERGE INTO table_name USING table_name ON (condition)
> WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET column1 = value1 [, column2 = value2 ...]
> WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT column1 [, column2 ...] VALUES (value1 [,
> value2 ...])
> At the moment, the only workaround for this would be to write a stored
> procedure to do the same operation, or to implement the logic client-side.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
