[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-3155:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: derby-3155-18-aa-basicView.diff

Attaching derby-3155-18-aa-basicView.diff. This patch fixes a problem Knut 
found when using a simple view as the source table of a MERGE statement.

The problem arose because views can be turned into FromSubqueries before an 
UPDATE action is bound. This causes the UpdateNode's bind logic to take an 
unexpected path. The fix was to make UpdateNode.bindStatement() not fall into 
that path.


Touches the following files:

-----------------

M       java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/UpdateNode.java

The fix.

-----------------

M       
java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/MergeStatementTest.java

A regression test.


> Support for SQL:2003 MERGE statement
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3155
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3155
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Trejkaz
>            Assignee: Rick Hillegas
>              Labels: derby_triage10_10
>         Attachments: MergeStatement.html, MergeStatement.html, 
> MergeStatement.html, derby-3155-01-ac-grammar.diff, 
> derby-3155-02-ag-fixParserWarning.diff, 
> derby-3155-03-ae-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff, 
> derby-3155-03-af-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff, 
> derby-3155-03-ag-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff, 
> derby-3155-03-ah-backingStoreHashtableWithRowLocation.diff, 
> derby-3155-04-ae-deleteAction.diff, derby-3155-04-af-deleteAction.diff, 
> derby-3155-05-aa-triggerTransitionTableAsTarget.diff, 
> derby-3155-06-aa-triggerTransitionTableAsSource.diff, 
> derby-3155-07-ad-insertAction.diff, derby-3155-08-ah-updateAction.diff, 
> derby-3155-09-aa-correlationNames.diff, 
> derby-3155-10-aa-correlationNames.diff, 
> derby-3155-11-ab-beforeTriggersCantFireMerge.diff, 
> derby-3155-12-aa-canOmitInsertColumnList.diff, 
> derby-3155-13-aa-allowSystemAndTempTables.diff, 
> derby-3155-14-aa-replaceCorrelationNamesOnLeftSideOfSETclauses.diff, 
> derby-3155-15-aa-replumbMergeResultSetCleanup.diff, 
> derby-3155-16-aa-treatCurrentRowLocationNodeLikeBaseColumnNode.diff, 
> derby-3155-17-aa-serializingRowLocations.diff, derby-3155-18-aa-basicView.diff
>
>
> A relatively common piece of logic in a database application is to check for 
> a row's existence and then either update or insert depending on its existence.
> SQL:2003 added a MERGE statement to perform this operation.  It looks like 
> this:
>     MERGE INTO table_name USING table_name ON (condition)
>     WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET column1 = value1 [, column2 = value2 ...]
>     WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT column1 [, column2 ...] VALUES (value1 [, 
> value2 ...]) 
> At the moment, the only workaround for this would be to write a stored 
> procedure to do the same operation, or to implement the logic client-side.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to