[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15823171#comment-15823171
]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-6856:
--------------------------------------
The junit test which failed under build 148 now fails under build 151 with a
different error:
{noformat}
There was 1 error:
1)
testSerialization(org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest)java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException:
Unable to make field private java.lang.String java.security.Permission.name
accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.security" to unnamed module
@7c417213
at
java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:207)
at
java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.checkCanSetAccessible(Field.java:171)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.setAccessible(Field.java:165)
at
org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.setField(SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.java:1039)
at
org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.createDBPermNoCheck(SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.java:998)
at
org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.testDatabasePermissionSerialization(SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.java:826)
at
org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.junit.SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.testSerialization(SystemPrivilegesPermissionTest.java:784)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at
org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestCase.runBare(BaseTestCase.java:120)
at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:24)
at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:21)
at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:25)
FAILURES!!!
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 1
{noformat}
> Make it possible to build Derby using JDK 9
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6856
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6856
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Build tools
> Affects Versions: 10.12.1.1
> Reporter: Rick Hillegas
> Attachments: derby-6856-01-ab-addShardingKey.diff,
> derby-6856-01-ac-cleanup.diff, derby-6856-02-aa-addShardingKey.diff,
> derby-6856-03-aa-autoboxingDeprecationWarnings.diff,
> derby-6856-03-ab-autoboxingDeprecationWarnings.diff,
> derby-6856-04-aa-autoboxingDeprecationWarnings-part2.diff,
> derby-6856-04-ab-autoboxingDeprecationWarnings-part2.diff,
> derby-6856-05-ac-roundingMode-Class.newInstance.diff,
> derby-6856-05-af-roundingMode-Class.getDeclaredConstructor.diff,
> derby-6856-05-ag-roundingMode-Class.newInstance.diff,
> derby-6856-06-aa-observable.diff, derby-6856-07-aa-oneMoreNewInstance.diff,
> derby-6856-08-aa-cleanupJavadoc.diff, derby-6856-09-aa-javadocEntities.diff,
> derby-6856-XX-ab-base.diff, derby-6856-XX-ac-base.diff, PTest.java,
> ptestScript
>
>
> Derby can't be built with JDK 9. Java 9 introduces new JDBC classes like
> java.sql.ShardingKey and methods which refer to these new classes.
> In addition, project Jigsaw has created a new way to name classes (see
> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220). This breaks the PropertySetter build tool
> which we use so that old JVMs can compile Derby and so that Derby can be
> compiled to run on old JVMs.
> It is likely that we will need to leave this issue open throughout the
> development cycle of Java 9.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
