Anurag Shekhar (JIRA) wrote: > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-819?page=all ]
> Anurag Shekhar updated DERBY-819: > --------------------------------- > > Attachment: (was: derby-819.diff) and then > > Anurag Shekhar updated DERBY-819: > --------------------------------- > > Attachment: derby-819.diff I belive it's a good habit to use a new name for the patch file when updating it in Jira, including a version number or a date e.g. derby-819_3.diff or derby-819_20060124.diff. This just reduces the chance that a committer will commit the wrong patch, by accidently using an older version that was already on their system. With this approach there is also no need to remove the old patch, they can be useful sometimes, to compare the aprroaches. Dan.
