Myrna van Lunteren wrote: > On 2/2/06, *Daniel John Debrunner* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Possibly the best way forward is to limit this patch to the DERBY-891's > description, renaming properties. Then clean up the granted socket > permissions in a separate jira item. Keeping distinct issues separated > is always good. > > > Fair enough, I should've kept it straight. I'll fix up the policy file > to have just the name changes, run derbyall with classes, sane, and > insane jars (pointless to try the remote server stuff) and - probably > tomorrow - submit a new patch.
If submit the patch before the test runs I will look at committing it. If the difference to the previous patch is not deleting that permission then the existing test runs are sufficient. Thanks, Dan.
