Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > Hmmm, very strange. I would have thought that in remote mode the server > needed accept permission on the real hostname, not just on 127.0.0.1 or > localhost which is all that would be left after this patch.
I think I'm also confused between 'listen' and 'accept' permission. The test policy file does not have listen permission, but the docs say listen is only applicable for locahost. If a machine has two network addresses and I only want the derby server to be accessible remotely through one of those addresses, is that defined by an 'accept' or 'listen' permission, or some combination of the two. Guess I need to look at the java doc more and what the network server uses. Dan.
