Rajesh Kartha wrote:
> Going forward, I suggest any issues (specially Bugs, Test failures) > marked 'Blocker' or 'Critical' needs > to get the immediate attention to be evaluated for assigning (have an > owner) or marking (the priority) > accordingly. Any regression test failures would fall into this category. That would be great, but if it's no one's itch to fix such a problem it's not going to get assigned to anyone. Critical is in the eye of the beholder. Assigining a bug to someone just to make it unassigned is not a good idea. It's also a way to bring new contributors into the project, if they enter a critical issue and no-one looks at it, then maybe their itch will be strong enough for them to get involved. > I can volunteer to monitor and send follow-up mails, for addressing the > high priority > Derby issues, on a regular basis. Reminders about apparent critical issues not being scratched would be good. Thanks, Dan.
