Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
>"Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>
>
>> [
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-821?page=comments#action_12365237
>> ]
>>
>>Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-821:
>>--------------------------------------
>>
>>Bryan posted some questions on the list. I put the link here for reference.
>>
>>http://www.nabble.com/DERBY-821-comments-t1065371.html
>>
>>I have not had an opportunity to review the patch but hope to do so
>>tomorrow. I was wondering if you had tested 10.1/10.2 client/server
>>combinations.
>>
>>
>
>I have run derbynetclientmats on trunk with only server changes
>applied (checking the combination of new server/old client) and on
>10.1 with only client changes applied (new client/old server). No
>failures.
>
>
>
>>If there is special logic needed for JCC, I am
>>guessing it might also be needed for older clients and ODBC, but
>>just a guess as I have not yet looked at the patch.
>>
>>
>
>Do you know what the ODBC clients identify themselves as? I found
>these types of clients in AppRequester.java:
>
> protected static final int UNKNOWN_CLIENT = 0;
> protected static final int JCC_CLIENT = 1;
> protected static final int CCC_CLIENT = 2; // not yet supported.
> protected static final int DNC_CLIENT = 3; // derby net client
>
>
>
ODBC is CCC. The // not yet supported comment must be old. Army would
be able to say better if any change is needed for ODBC. It may just be
fine.
