Thanks, Andreas, I'll take a look. It's a busy day today so this may not happen until Monday.

David

Andreas Korneliussen (JIRA) wrote:
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-934?page=all ]

Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-934:
---------------------------------------

    Attachment: DERBY-934.diff

Here is an update. I now think I have fixed all the issues you reported, and 
especially added the checks on SQLState, added more comments and removed debug 
printing.
Renamed some of the testcases in ConcurrencyTest, and removed some testcases 
which were unuseful (discovered while I added the comments and checks for 
SQLState). ConcurrencyTest uses a mix of different isolation levels. When I use 
REP.READ, it is because I want to provoke a LOCK wait situation, however for 
most of these tests, the isolation level does not matter, since (except 
ConcurrencyTest) all tests just run one transaction at the time.



create a set of JUnit tests for Scrollable Updatable Resultsets
---------------------------------------------------------------

        Key: DERBY-934
        URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-934
    Project: Derby
       Type: Sub-task
 Components: Test
   Reporter: Andreas Korneliussen
   Assignee: Andreas Korneliussen
Attachments: DERBY-934.diff, DERBY-934.stat

Add a set of JUnit tests which tests the implementation for Scrollable 
Updatable ResultSets.
The following is a description of how the tests will be implemented:
Data model in test:
We use one table containing three int fields and one varchar(5000)
field. Then we run the tests on a number of variants of this model:
1. None of the fields are indexed (no primary key, no secondary key)
2. One of the fields is indexed as primary key
3. One of the fields is indexed as primary key, another field is
  indexed as secondary key
4. One field is indexed as secondary key
(primary key is unique, secondary key is not unique)
By having these variations in the data model, we cover a number of
variations where the ScrollInsensitiveResultSet implementation uses
different classes of source ResultSets, and the CurrentOfResultSet
uses different classes of target and source ResultSet.
The table can be created with the following fields:
(id int, a int, b int, c varchar(5000))
-
Queries for testing SUR:
Select conditions:
* Full table scan
SQL: SELECT * FROM T1
* Full table scan with criteria on non-indexed field
SQL: .. WHERE c like ?
SQL: .. WHERE b > ?
* Full table scan with criteria on indexed field
SQL: .. WHERE id>a
* SELECT on primary key conditionals:
- Upper and lower bond criteria:
SQL: .. WHERE ID>? and ID<?
SQL: .. WHERE ID=? -- (Single tuple)
* Nested queries:
SQL: .. WHERE ID in (1,2,3,4) SQL: .. WHERE a in (1,2,3,4) (Other nested queries containing a table seems to not permit updates)
* SELECT on secondary key conditionals:
SQL: .. WHERE a>? and a<?
SQL: .. WHERE a=?
* Projections:
SQL: SELECT id,a,b,c
SQL: SELECT id,c,b,a
SQL: SELECT id,c
SQL: SELECT id,a
SQL: SELECT a,b,c
SQL: SELECT a,b
SQL: SELECT a,c
The test should generate queries with all combinations of the
projection and select conditions, and then run a number of tests:
- test navigiation
- test updates + navigation
- test deletes + navigation
- check rowUpdated() and rowDeleted() fields
Scrollability: All scroll-insensitive cursors should be checked for
scrollability. Scrolling is tested by invoking: next(), previous(),
beforeFirst(), afterLast(), absolute(), relative(),  isBeforeFirst(),
isAfterLast(), isFirst(), isLast(),
Updating a scrollable resultset: a ResultSets current row can be
updated either by using updateXXX() + updateRow(), or by using
a positioned update query.  All tests which updates row, will come in
two variants covering both these cases.
-
Deleting rows in scrollable resultset also has two variants: one using
a positioned update query, and one using deleteRow().
-
Special testcases:
Test that you get a warning when specifying a query which is not
updatable and concurrency mode CONCUR_UPDATABLE.
Case 1: Query containing order by
Case 2: Query containing a join
Exceptions:
Test that you get an exception when specifying update clause "FOR UPDATE"
along with a query which is not updatable.
Cases:
* Query containing order by
* Query containing a join
Test that you get an exception when attempting to update a ResultSet which has been downgraded to a read only ResultSet due to the query Cases:
* Query contained a join
* Query contained a read only update clause
* Query contained a order by
Test that you get an exception when attempting to update a ResultSet which has concurrency mode CONCUR_READ_ONLY

Concurrency tests:
(ConcurrencyTest)
Cases: * Test that update locks are downgraded to shared locks after
 repositioning. (fails with derby)
* Test that we can aquire a update lock even if the row is locked with
 a shared lock.
* Test that we can aquire a shared lock even if the row is locked with
 an update lock.
* Test that we do not get a concurrency problem when opening two
 cursors as readonly.
* Test what happens if you update a deleted and purged record
* Test what happens if you update a deleted and purged record using
 positioned update
* Test what happens if you update a tuple which is deleted and then
 reinserted.
* Test what happens if you update a tuple which is deleted and then
 reinserted with the exact same values
* Test what happens if you update a tuple which has been modified by
 another transaction.
* Test that you cannot compress the table while the ResultSet is open,
 and the transaction is open (for validity of RowLocation)
* Test that you cannot purge a row if it is locked
* Test that Derby set updatelock on current row when using
 read-uncommitted


begin:vcard
fn:David W Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David W
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

Reply via email to