Moves to the mailing list. >>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote (2006-02-10 15:54:59): > [ > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-591?page=comments#action_12365900 > ]
> Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-591: > --------------------------------------------- > > Not sure what you are asking here Bernt. This is a bug reporting > that several Derby functions are incorrectly exposed thorugh the > JDBC escaped function mechanism. It's not about implementing more > escaped functions. Sorry if I was unclear. I'll try again: Sateesh addresses those functions in SQL which are *not* a part of the JDBC escaped-function-set as defined in the JDBC spec (unless I misinterpreted). I want also to address the functions defined in the JDBC-spec which have other names (and possibly other arguments/argument-syntax) in the SQL standard. They're all implemented today as if the JDBC escaped names are equal to the SQL names. Was that clearer? -- Bernt Marius Johnsen, Database Technology Group, Staff Engineer, Technical Lead Derby/Java DB Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
