Andrew McIntyre wrote: > On 2/27/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Let's not rush into removing this feature, which is really useful for >>the majority of Derby users. Let's understand the impact on existing >>users and see what the best way forward is. > > > Ack! Read this about two seconds too late. But, it's certainly easy > enough to put back.
Yep, easy to put back. Good though, to let the discussion evolve so that others in different time-zones can join in. > I'll file another JIRA for investigating the compatibility impact of > adding the Class-Path attribute to derbytools.jar Isn't DERBY-1019 the correct place for this? Dan.
