On 3/1/06, Stanley Bradbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Having all the jars start with 'derby' has the advantage of making them > easy to search for and they will short together in an alphabetical > listing like is produced by most directory listings. Having them sort > together when listing out jarfiles in Server libdirectory or other jar > repository environment is really nice. > > How about derbygo.jar ?
I agree with all of this as well. This is the problem with naming things: there are often competing suggestions that each have their own merit and none of them is necessarily the "right" one. They all would work. Anyway, I'll let this go a little while longer in case anyone else has other good ideas. andrew
