Andrew McIntyre wrote: > I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to > execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063: > derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar > > So far these are the proposed names: > > derbycmd.jar > derbyctl.jar > derbygo.jar > derbyrun.jar > goderby.jar > runderby.jar > > Does anyone have a strong feeling for going with any of these names?
I like the ones where 'go' or 'run' is before derby, shows the jar has a different purpose to the other jar files. I think I like runderby.jar the best. Dan.
