incomplete nature of Grant & Revoke authorization, I vote to keep one release in Sep/Oct.
Satheesh
On 4/26/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Yes, I'm still planning to manage a JDBC4-capable Derby release to go GA
soon after Mustang (jdk1.6) goes GA in September/October. Bryan and Knut
have expressed some concern that the Mustang schedule may slip. Although
I do not foresee a Mustang schedule slip, I acknowledge the risk here.
My plans assume that Mustang will hit its deliverables.
Regards,
-Rick
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>On 4/26/06, Knut Anders Hatlen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>A bug-fix release on the 10.1 branch is very good for Derby in my
>>opinion, but I would also really like to see that we got all the new
>>features out to our users.
>>
>>I would therefore like to have a 10.2
>>release not depending on the JDBC 4.0 schedule (which means that the
>>release most likely will be without JDBC 4.0 support).
>>
>>
>
>So what you're saying is that the release you are proposing is
>definitely going to be without JDBC 4.0? Or are you saying that
>somehow JDBC 4.0 support might be included in your release?
>
>
>
>>Is this something the community wants and would support?
>>
>>
>
>Rick, are you still planning to have a release with JDBC 4.0 in the
>Sept./Oct. timeframe? And does it really make sense to have two such
>feature releases so close together, within two months of each other?
>
>If Rick is still planning another feature release - which would now be
>10.3 I suppose - in Sept./Oct., then it's a -1 from me. Personally,
>I'm not much interested just in the churn and the time involved in
>testing two such feature releases so close together right after a
>maintenance release.
>
>andrew
>
>
