Andrew McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 4/26/06, Knut Anders Hatlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A bug-fix release on the 10.1 branch is very good for Derby in my >> opinion, but I would also really like to see that we got all the new >> features out to our users. >> >> I would therefore like to have a 10.2 >> release not depending on the JDBC 4.0 schedule (which means that the >> release most likely will be without JDBC 4.0 support). > > So what you're saying is that the release you are proposing is > definitely going to be without JDBC 4.0? Or are you saying that > somehow JDBC 4.0 support might be included in your release?
I don't see that there's any possibility for a release with JDBC 4.0 in August. >> Is this something the community wants and would support? > > Rick, are you still planning to have a release with JDBC 4.0 in the > Sept./Oct. timeframe? And does it really make sense to have two such > feature releases so close together, within two months of each other? > > If Rick is still planning another feature release - which would now be > 10.3 I suppose - in Sept./Oct., then it's a -1 from me. Personally, > I'm not much interested just in the churn and the time involved in > testing two such feature releases so close together right after a > maintenance release. Thanks for your feedback. I will take that into consideration. -- Knut Anders
