I agree that this can't be accepted without further work, but at least
we can take what he's given us. I suspect Stephen won't have time to do
the tests or functional spec, but perhaps someone with an itch can get
that done. The good news is that that someone is no longer blocked from
using his code.
David
Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
David Van Couvering wrote:
Great news! Let's hope we can get all the loose ends tied up and get
this contributed!
David
As anyone tested this, other than the author? Dan seemed to have raised
some important concerns. Anyone with itch to follow up this work needs
to investigate more, address those concerns and try running all tests.
Also would be good to writeup a design or functional spec and get that
reviewed.
Satheesh
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 5/23/06, Darcy Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree with you. One goal of this work was to hopefully bring the
code to
submission level, so we didn't complete the forms until the code looked
good enough to contribute. I was able to contact Stephen, and he
submitted
the ICLA forms by fax back in March. Hopefully they are on file
somewhere,
or he will have to submit them again. I've contacted him and asked
him to
finish up what is needed so that the code can be submitted to the tree.
Hopefully this will happen soon.
LOL. Yes, it's on file:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
Down at the bottom. Should have checked there to begin with. Thanks,
Darcy. Sorry for all the noise.
andrew
