note: I'm dropping [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the cc because we're headed down a Derby project policy path.
Jean T. Anderson wrote: > Daniel John Debrunner wrote: <snipping> >>Seems like the Derby wiki may be ok for sharing sample code for Derby, >>but not the code for or developing a complete application. Lots of >>applications can use Derby, doesn't mena they need to be hosted on >>Derby's wiki. > > I haven't found a precedent for sharing user application code at the > ASF, so it appears this is a first. > > The line between "sample" and "complete application" will be blurry. > Ideally, any sample should be able to be built and run. Then the > question becomes, how big is too big? And how does that decision get made? There is derby interest in sharing user code; see the thread starting at: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200603.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] My only experience with sharing user code is the International Informix Users Group ( http://www.iiug.org/ ), which I used to be active in many years ago. That web site hosts many user contributions, great and small. Does anyone know of/have experience with any open source projects that manage user contributions? -jean
