Jean T. Anderson wrote: > note: I'm dropping [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the cc because we're headed > down a Derby project policy path. > > Jean T. Anderson wrote: > >>Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > > > <snipping> > >>>Seems like the Derby wiki may be ok for sharing sample code for Derby, >>>but not the code for or developing a complete application. Lots of >>>applications can use Derby, doesn't mena they need to be hosted on >>>Derby's wiki. >> >>I haven't found a precedent for sharing user application code at the >>ASF, so it appears this is a first.
What about the Lucene sandbox? >>The line between "sample" and "complete application" will be blurry. >>Ideally, any sample should be able to be built and run. Then the >>question becomes, how big is too big? And how does that decision get made? > > > There is derby interest in sharing user code; see the thread starting at: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200603.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] I think sharing code is good. I think using Derby resources (wiki/mailing lists) to develop a project to be shared is not good. People on the developer & user list are probably not interested in the development discussion of, say, a personal information mangagment system, though they might be interested in looking at the final result. Dan.
