Andrew McIntyre wrote:

On 8/9/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Is there any impact to having a milestone event like beta 10.2  not
recorded in our svn history?

If the beta reports as being at a revision that is modified
from what's in svn, then that's a little suspect. What really went out
as the beta? There's no way to verify via source control. That's a
problem, to me anyway.

That is why the copy and flip a bit strategy worries me. It sounds like the same beginning to a story that I have seen played out many times with poor results. Lots of confusion and only project historians and witnesses can tell you what really happened. I think whatever we put out should be built straight from the repository.

Kathey


Reply via email to