Mike Matrigali wrote: > I skipped the original posting, took a look at subject and was not > really interested in CURRENT TIME handling. But I happened to look > back and think it is valuable reading about the compilation/execution > engine. The write > up is interesting, and gives some insite into compile vs. runtime > decisions.
Thanks Mike, yes the first part of the subject was meant to be the important part, next time I'll make it something like: The perils of complexity (example from CURRENT TIME handling) Dan.
