[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1130?page=all ]

Deepa Remesh resolved DERBY-1130.
---------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
    Derby Info: [Patch Available, Existing Application Impact, Release Note 
Needed]  (was: [Release Note Needed, Patch Available, Existing Application 
Impact])

Verified the fix is in trunk (10.3) and 10.2 branch.

Here is the release note for this issue:

PROBLEM:

Derby's client DataSources were using a wrong database name when getting a 
connection in the following case:
* databaseName is not set as a Derby DataSource property
* databaseName is set as a connection attribute using setConnectionAttributes 
method

SYMPTOM:

Instead of throwing an exception saying databaseName is a required Derby 
DataSource property and must be set, client driver was using "null" as database 
name and returning a connection to database named "null".

CAUSE:

The database name was constructed wrongly in the client driver.

SOLUTION:

This was solved by setting the internal database name property in the client 
driver correctly. Also ensured that databaseName set as a connection attribute 
will not be used by Derby's client DataSources.. This fix will be available in 
Derby versions 10.2 and above.

WORKAROUND:

If using release prior to version 10.2, make sure database name is set only as 
a DataSource property when using Derby's client DataSources. 

> Client should not allow databaseName to be set with setConnectionAttributes
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1130
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1130
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Client
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.1.0, 10.1.1.1, 10.1.1.2, 10.1.2.0, 10.1.2.1, 
> 10.1.2.2, 10.1.2.3, 10.2.1.0, 10.1.3.0, 10.1.2.4
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>         Assigned To: Deepa Remesh
>             Fix For: 10.2.1.0, 10.3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: d1130-client-v1.diff, d1130-client-v1.status, 
> d1130-test-dataSourceReference.diff, d1130-test-dataSourceReference.status, 
> d1130-v2.diff, d1130-v2.status, derby-1130-v1.diff, derby-1130-v1.status
>
>
> Per this thread,  setConnectionAttributes should not set databaseName. 
> http://www.nabble.com/double-check-on-checkDataSource-t1187602.html#a3128621
> Currently this is allowed for client but should be disabled.  I think it is 
> OK to change because we have documented that client will be changed to match 
> embedded for implementation defined behaviour.   Hopefully its use is rare as 
> most folks would use the standard setDatabaseName.  Still there should be a 
> release not when the change is made and it would be better to change it 
> sooner than later:
> Below is the repro. 
> Here is the output with Client
> D>java DatabaseNameWithSetConnAttr
> ds.setConnectionAttributes(databaseName=wombat;create=true)
> ds.getDatabaseName() = null (should be null)
> FAIL: Should not have been able to set databaseName with connection attributes
> Also look for tests  disabled with this bug number in the test 
> checkDataSource30.java
> import java.sql.*;
> import java.lang.reflect.Method;
> public class DatabaseNameWithSetConnAttr{
>       public static void main(String[] args) {
>               try {
>               
>                       String attributes = "databaseName=wombat;create=true";
>                       org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDataSource ds = new
>                       org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDataSource();
>                       //org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDataSource ds = new
>                       //org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDataSource();
>                       System.out.println("ds.setConnectionAttributes(" + 
> attributes + ")");
>                       ds.setConnectionAttributes(attributes);
>                       System.out.println("ds.getDatabaseName() = " +
>                                                          ds.getDatabaseName() 
> + " (should be null)" );
>                       Connection conn  = ds.getConnection();
>                       } catch (SQLException e) {
>                               String sqlState = e.getSQLState();
>                               if (sqlState != null && 
> sqlState.equals("XJ041"))
>                               {
>                               System.out.println("PASS: An exception was 
> thrown trying to get a connetion from a datasource after setting databaseName 
> with setConnectionAttributes");
>                               System.out.println("EXPECTED EXCEPTION: " + 
> e.getSQLState() 
>                                                                          + " 
> - " + e.getMessage());
>                               return;
>                               }
>                               while (e != null)
>                               {
>                                       System.out.println("FAIL - UNEXPECTED 
> EXCEPTION: " + e.getSQLState());
>                                       e.printStackTrace();
>                                       e = e.getNextException();
>                               }
>                               return;
>                       }
>               System.out.println("FAIL: Should not have been able to set 
> databaseName with connection attributes");
>       }
> }

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to