Jean T. Anderson wrote:
David Van Couvering wrote:
Laura Stewart (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1271?page=comments#action_12434569
] Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1271:
--------------------------------------
Jean -
Here is my attempt at wordsmithing...
"JDBC 4.0 functionality is not enabled in this Derby release. JDBC 4.0
is part of Java SE 6, which was not generally available for Derby
10.2. When you use Derby with a Java SE 6 virtual machine, JDBC 3.0 is
available. JDBC 4.0 is available only to developers who download Java
SE 6 and use it to add JDBC 4.0 support to Derby. The Release Notes
explain how to build the JDBC 4.0 functionality with Derby 10.2. When
Java SE 6 becomes generally available, a follow-on Derby release will
include final JDBC 4.0 functionality. "
- I think 'was not generally available at the time of the Derby 10.2
release' is a better phrasing
I really like the positive spin of Myrna's suggested first sentence:
This release includes JDBC 4.0 functionality based on a pre-release of
Java SE 6.
could that replace the first two sentences?
Yes
