One more thing I meant to add: I find it hard to review other people's doc changes when they are posted as DITA diffs only, because I'm not that practiced reading DITA diffs. So I think the preferred way to post doc patches for review is something like: - make the change and run the build, to generate HTML - attach the svn diff and stat output, as usual - *also* attach the generated html pages, so reviewers can see how the docs will look without having to build the HTML themselves.
thanks, bryan
